<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: vSphere in a Box: A “Virtual Private Cloud” Blueprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/</link>
	<description>The deep core of the phenomena</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:34:45 +0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hany Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-4511</link>
		<dc:creator>Hany Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-4511</guid>
		<description>Hi Ryan,

Good question! The templates won’t affect the licenses in any way, shape or form. You consume your licensing only when you add the vESX hosts to the vCenter. For example, you can have 100 vESX templates/libraries that are un-deployed, while you are having 10 vESX hosts deployed and active. In this example you are consuming only 10 licenses from your vCenter, not 100. Remember, these 100 vESX hosts are either templates sitting as files on your storage, or just VMs sitting in your physical ESX host (which again won’t count as real ESX hosts).

As a matter of fact, I see now that this “vSphere In A Box” approach for doing your labs will save you a huge deal of your NFR licenses due to the great flexibility you are having.

Hope this helps

Hany</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan,</p>
<p>Good question! The templates won’t affect the licenses in any way, shape or form. You consume your licensing only when you add the vESX hosts to the vCenter. For example, you can have 100 vESX templates/libraries that are un-deployed, while you are having 10 vESX hosts deployed and active. In this example you are consuming only 10 licenses from your vCenter, not 100. Remember, these 100 vESX hosts are either templates sitting as files on your storage, or just VMs sitting in your physical ESX host (which again won’t count as real ESX hosts).</p>
<p>As a matter of fact, I see now that this “vSphere In A Box” approach for doing your labs will save you a huge deal of your NFR licenses due to the great flexibility you are having.</p>
<p>Hope this helps</p>
<p>Hany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;ve got a quick few questions.  I&#039;m just starting to look at how to build a test dev lab similar to this.  I work for a company that is a vmware partner, so I have NFR licences available.

How does thin provisioning templated ESX vSphere 4 servers work with the licensing side of things?  I&#039;m just worried about using up loads of licenses when doing this..

My plan was to install either Workstation or ESXi 4.0, then setup 2 x ESX 4.0 servers clustered to test all the various HA/FT etc features..  If I need to blow this all away will recreating them use additional NFR licenses?

Sorry if these questions are basic, I&#039;m just trying to get my head around how this works, last thing I want to do is use up all my companies NFR&#039;s due to lack of knowledge.

Thanks for your help,
R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#039;ve got a quick few questions.  I&#039;m just starting to look at how to build a test dev lab similar to this.  I work for a company that is a vmware partner, so I have NFR licences available.</p>
<p>How does thin provisioning templated ESX vSphere 4 servers work with the licensing side of things?  I&#039;m just worried about using up loads of licenses when doing this..</p>
<p>My plan was to install either Workstation or ESXi 4.0, then setup 2 x ESX 4.0 servers clustered to test all the various HA/FT etc features..  If I need to blow this all away will recreating them use additional NFR licenses?</p>
<p>Sorry if these questions are basic, I&#039;m just trying to get my head around how this works, last thing I want to do is use up all my companies NFR&#039;s due to lack of knowledge.</p>
<p>Thanks for your help,<br />
R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware vSphere - виртуализация ЦОД &#187; vSphere in a Box или облако VMware в коробке.</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3407</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware vSphere - виртуализация ЦОД &#187; vSphere in a Box или облако VMware в коробке.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-3407</guid>
		<description>[...] vSphere in a Box: A “Virtual Private Cloud” Blueprint vSphere In A Box: Part(2): Putting the pieces all together vSphere In A Box: (Part 3): The Lab Manager 4.0 Automation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vSphere in a Box: A “Virtual Private Cloud” Blueprint vSphere In A Box: Part(2): Putting the pieces all together vSphere In A Box: (Part 3): The Lab Manager 4.0 Automation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Link Roundup 20090726 &#124; latoga labs</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3268</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Link Roundup 20090726 &#124; latoga labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-3268</guid>
		<description>[...] vSphere in a Box: A “Virtual Private Cloud” Blueprint &#8211; while not officially supported by VMware, running nested VMs is a great way to build out your lab&#8230;and here&#8217;s your blueprint thanks to HyperViZor. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vSphere in a Box: A “Virtual Private Cloud” Blueprint &#8211; while not officially supported by VMware, running nested VMs is a great way to build out your lab&#8230;and here&#039;s your blueprint thanks to HyperViZor. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hany Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>Hany Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>Cool, I’m glad you fixed it, I had the same issue with the NICs initially (but without having this error), you may want to check my second part and video, I noted some of these points :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, I’m glad you fixed it, I had the same issue with the NICs initially (but without having this error), you may want to check my second part and video, I noted some of these points <img src='http://www.hypervizor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinf_net</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3137</link>
		<dc:creator>vinf_net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-3137</guid>
		<description>Ignore last comment - found the cause of the problem - FT NICs were mapped the wrong way round and it couldn&#039;t ship CPU instructions to the secondary vESX node, hence problem...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignore last comment &#8211; found the cause of the problem &#8211; FT NICs were mapped the wrong way round and it couldn&#039;t ship CPU instructions to the secondary vESX node, hence problem&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinf_net</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>vinf_net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>Hi, great post - I&#039;ve got a single ML115-g5 and trying to build a very similar setup, can VM ESXi4 hosts easy enough but cannot enable FT for a nested VM; when I try to enable it I get &quot;Virtual machines in the same fault tolerance pair cannot be on the same host&quot; and it can&#039;t start the secondary VM.

its almost as if some hardware ID is passed through from the physical host to the VM&#039;d ESX nodes

Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, great post &#8211; I&#039;ve got a single ML115-g5 and trying to build a very similar setup, can VM ESXi4 hosts easy enough but cannot enable FT for a nested VM; when I try to enable it I get &#034;Virtual machines in the same fault tolerance pair cannot be on the same host&#034; and it can&#039;t start the secondary VM.</p>
<p>its almost as if some hardware ID is passed through from the physical host to the VM&#039;d ESX nodes</p>
<p>Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ping Back</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3104</link>
		<dc:creator>Ping Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-3104</guid>
		<description>[...] Hany Michael published a great article about VMware ESX/vSphere in a box solution for creating quick methodologies to roll out VMware infrastructure lab and test environments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hany Michael published a great article about VMware ESX/vSphere in a box solution for creating quick methodologies to roll out VMware infrastructure lab and test environments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hany Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Hany Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>Thank you Eric, great minds think alike ;) 

I’m very interested too in exploring the ESX functionality as a hypervisor rather than just running a bunch of nested VMs on it. What you said about the root-cause analysis is another great reason to run a vESX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Eric, great minds think alike <img src='http://www.hypervizor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I’m very interested too in exploring the ESX functionality as a hypervisor rather than just running a bunch of nested VMs on it. What you said about the root-cause analysis is another great reason to run a vESX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ping Back</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/07/vsphere-in-a-box-a-virtual-private-cloud-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator>Ping Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=521#comment-3077</guid>
		<description>[...] For anyone interested in seeing how a virtual private cloud setup might look, this post has a great diagram to go along with lots of detail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For anyone interested in seeing how a virtual private cloud setup might look, this post has a great diagram to go along with lots of detail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
