<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: vSphere 4.0 Fault Tolerance (Architecture Diagram, Video and Use Cases)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/</link>
	<description>The deep core of the phenomena</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:34:45 +0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VMware vSphere Fault Tolerance &#171; My Blog, My Precious.</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-5409</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware vSphere Fault Tolerance &#171; My Blog, My Precious.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-5409</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is a great little write up from HyperVizor on a very much under-used (IMHO) feature of vSphere, name FT (Fault Tolerance). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is a great little write up from HyperVizor on a very much under-used (IMHO) feature of vSphere, name FT (Fault Tolerance). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hany Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-5315</link>
		<dc:creator>Hany Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-5315</guid>
		<description>FT is not a disaster recovery solution nor should it ever be considered for that. You may want to check vCenter Site Recovery Manager (SRM) from VMware. It&#039;s a very powerful product that can automate your DR solution for VI3.5 &amp; vSphere (check out my tutorials here as well)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FT is not a disaster recovery solution nor should it ever be considered for that. You may want to check vCenter Site Recovery Manager (SRM) from VMware. It&#39;s a very powerful product that can automate your DR solution for VI3.5 &#038; vSphere (check out my tutorials here as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHG</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-5314</link>
		<dc:creator>MHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-5314</guid>
		<description>In designing a disaster recovery hotsite with VMware FT what would be our most likely single point of failure and what are the best practice recommendations for such a task?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In designing a disaster recovery hotsite with VMware FT what would be our most likely single point of failure and what are the best practice recommendations for such a task?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hany Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-5313</link>
		<dc:creator>Hany Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-5313</guid>
		<description>No, you just need one copy of the VM on the SAN/NAS. The second instance of the VM lives inside the memory, not the storage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you just need one copy of the VM on the SAN/NAS. The second instance of the VM lives inside the memory, not the storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHG</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-5312</link>
		<dc:creator>MHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-5312</guid>
		<description>So, does FT actually require 2X the SAN / NAS storage for each VM?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Excerpt ….&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VMware Fault Tolerance provides continuous availability for virtual machines by creating and maintaining a Secondary VM that is identical to, and continuously available to replace, the Primary VM in the event of a failover situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, does FT actually require 2X the SAN / NAS storage for each VM?</p>
<p>Excerpt ….</p>
<p>VMware Fault Tolerance provides continuous availability for virtual machines by creating and maintaining a Secondary VM that is identical to, and continuously available to replace, the Primary VM in the event of a failover situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hany Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-5248</link>
		<dc:creator>Hany Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-5248</guid>
		<description>Hi Ted,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comment, and I’m glad you liked the site!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1 – I’m not sure why you can’t get the sound working, I just injected a normal mp3 file into the video.&lt;br&gt;2 – All my production ESX hosts are definitely physical. The vESX (or the while vSphere In A Box) are not meant for production what so ever. The diagram also is just an illustration/blueprint of how the FT works. My use-cases of course are the ones that I have my production environment.&lt;br&gt;3 – All the SANs these days can tolerate the most severe hardware failures (hardisks through RAID, redundant controllers ..etc), so I wouldn’t call it a single point of failure. If you are talking about DR, then this is another story, and this is why you have the VMware Site Recovery Manager (SRM), where you do have replication between two SANs/Sites and the SRM takes care of the failover/failback process for you. You may want to check my tutorials on SRM as well, I think you’ll like this incredible product and how it can add great value when it comes to DR.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ted,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment, and I’m glad you liked the site!</p>
<p>1 – I’m not sure why you can’t get the sound working, I just injected a normal mp3 file into the video.<br />2 – All my production ESX hosts are definitely physical. The vESX (or the while vSphere In A Box) are not meant for production what so ever. The diagram also is just an illustration/blueprint of how the FT works. My use-cases of course are the ones that I have my production environment.<br />3 – All the SANs these days can tolerate the most severe hardware failures (hardisks through RAID, redundant controllers ..etc), so I wouldn’t call it a single point of failure. If you are talking about DR, then this is another story, and this is why you have the VMware Site Recovery Manager (SRM), where you do have replication between two SANs/Sites and the SRM takes care of the failover/failback process for you. You may want to check my tutorials on SRM as well, I think you’ll like this incredible product and how it can add great value when it comes to DR.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-5246</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-5246</guid>
		<description>Amazing site!  It&#039;s almost midnight, I&#039;ve got to go to bed, and I&#039;m going to lie there thinking about vSphere in a Box!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Three things:&lt;br&gt;1. I can&#039;t get the sound to work on your videos-- tried in FF v3.5.x and IE v8.x... I must be doing something wrong.&lt;br&gt;2. In your diagram, you name the ESX hosts in a way that implies they are vESX, then talk about FT in a production environment.  All your production hosts are pESX, right?  I didn&#039;t actually watch the video on this-- perhaps I missed something...&lt;br&gt;3. Your SAN is still the single point of failure, right?  Perhaps you have some active/active replication going on that you don&#039;t mention.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing site!  It&#39;s almost midnight, I&#39;ve got to go to bed, and I&#39;m going to lie there thinking about vSphere in a Box!</p>
<p>Three things:<br />1. I can&#39;t get the sound to work on your videos&#8211; tried in FF v3.5.x and IE v8.x&#8230; I must be doing something wrong.<br />2. In your diagram, you name the ESX hosts in a way that implies they are vESX, then talk about FT in a production environment.  All your production hosts are pESX, right?  I didn&#39;t actually watch the video on this&#8211; perhaps I missed something&#8230;<br />3. Your SAN is still the single point of failure, right?  Perhaps you have some active/active replication going on that you don&#39;t mention.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hany Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-4564</link>
		<dc:creator>Hany Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-4564</guid>
		<description>Sure thing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure thing <img src='http://www.hypervizor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Howarth</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-4563</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Howarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-4563</guid>
		<description>One other issue that FT will not protect against is OS coruption, but that is what your Backups are for ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other issue that FT will not protect against is OS coruption, but that is what your Backups are for ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vNetwork Distributed Switches (vDS) an overview &#171; Virtualised Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-4459</link>
		<dc:creator>vNetwork Distributed Switches (vDS) an overview &#171; Virtualised Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypervizor.com/?p=657#comment-4459</guid>
		<description>[..] We are now onto the second stage of the VMware vSphere Blogging contest, the winner of week one’s FT subject was Hany Michael from http://www.hypervizor.com/ you can read his post here &gt;&gt; http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/ you can also get the full run down from VMware on the vSphere blog here &gt;&gt; http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/ Congratulations to Hany for the win it was well deserved [..]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[..] We are now onto the second stage of the VMware vSphere Blogging contest, the winner of week one’s FT subject was Hany Michael from <a href="http://www.hypervizor.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hypervizor.com/</a> you can read his post here >> <a href="http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hypervizor.com/2009/09/vsphere-40-fault-tolerance-architecture-diagram-video-and-use-cases/</a> you can also get the full run down from VMware on the vSphere blog here >> <a href="http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/</a> Congratulations to Hany for the win it was well deserved [..]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
